Stand-Up
What have you done, what are you doing, what are you yet to do?
Adam, Moad
- Allow to use middle mouse click to open from viewlets pinned #14453 [3]
James, Myoran
- Ctrl-Up and Ctrl-Down don’t advance cursor when hits page limit #2091 [5]
- Support to print the editor contents #5953 [10]
Luke, Adam
- Automatically assign tab name from file content #12017 [5]
Luke
- Introduce Google Search functionality when console throws compiler error [7]
Retrospective
The board at the end of the second sprint.
As a reminder:
The group decided to run their retrospectives using a traffic light system.
Green – Things that went well, the types of things we want to replicate
Amber – Things that went okay, but definitely need improving. Also, things that we learned that we must remember for the next sprint.
Red – Things that went badly. Issues that occurred that we must ensure are never repeated again.
Green
– Idea communication continued to be good. The discussion of potential problems and the way in which we assigned those problems was good.
– Trello board was consistently used and updated.
– Continued use of Discord allowed for effect pair programming.
– Lack of pair programming was good, allowed the group to be more efficient
– Not using pair programming logs again allowed for more efficient programming
– Posting of potential solution attached as a .txt file on the Trello board was excellent. It conceptualised the problem and acted as pseudo-code.
– Discussion between teams on potential ways to get around JSON configuration issue was a good example of collaboration.
– Adaptions to Trello board in terms of monitoring workflow were used effectively.
Amber
– GitHub continues not to be particularly been used well, it has been used to pull down the code but nothing else. This is mainly due to the constraints of the project.
– Getting an actual debug instance running for the project continues to be an issue. Moving from machine to machine can become time consuming. This can only be resolved by using the same machine, or developers become to familiar with the process they can resolve the issue(s) straight away.
– UML diagrams should be completed. Difficult to conceptualise the whole project as VSCode is such a wide scale thing.
– UML for the issues/features the group is working on aren’t wholly appropriate as scale of problem is so small.
Red
– Burndown chart for sprint cycle 2, in terms of workload was way too ambitious, especially considering the amount of story points the group got through in the first sprint.
– Continued work from last sprint seriously hindered overall progress of the project. Could’ve been handled much better.
– Sizing has been way too small for tasks undertaken.
Burndown Chart – Sprint Cycle 2